SEBI Cracks Down on BSE Over Alleged Regulatory Breaches Findings in the report
The Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) has initiated significant proceedings against Bombay Stock Exchange Limited (BSE) following an inspection covering February 2021 to September 2022. A detailed Show Cause Notice (SCN) issued on September 23, 2024, outlines several serious allegations, pointing towards potential lapses in regulatory compliance and market integrity at one of India's premier stock exchanges.
Unfair Advantage: The Information Dissemination Controversy
One of the primary concerns raised by SEBI revolves around BSE's system architecture, which allegedly allowed certain paid clients and even BSE’s own Listing Compliance Monitoring (LCM) team to access unpublished price sensitive information (UPSI) before its public release on the official BSE website.
This was reportedly due to the absence of an RSS feed for corporate announcements post-publication, creating a potential loophole for information asymmetry. SEBI highlighted this as a violation of Regulation 39(3) of the SECC Regulations and elements of the SEBI (Prohibition of Insider Trading) Regulations, 2015 (PIT Regulations).
Negligence in Monitoring Broker Conduct
SEBI's inspection also brought to light BSE’s alleged failure to establish a clear policy for handling frequent modifiers – brokers who repeatedly alter client codes after trades. Furthermore, the market regulator accused BSE of not taking appropriate disciplinary actions against such brokers, a critical oversight that could compromise fair trading practices and market transparency.
Scrutiny Over 'Error Accounts' and Client Code Modifications
The SCN also points to BSE's purported failure to thoroughly review 'error accounts' to ensure that trades were genuinely liquidated in the market and not merely shifted to different clients. This practice, if unchecked, could lead to manipulation and a lack of accountability.
Additionally, SEBI alleged that BSE permitted client code modifications for trades between unrelated institutional clients without adequate due diligence or imposing penalties, further raising questions about the exchange’s oversight mechanisms.
These accusations signify a broader concern regarding BSE's adherence to various SEBI regulations and circulars designed to ensure robust data dissemination, ethical broker conduct, and transparent client code modification procedures.
BSE's Defense: A Multi-pronged Rebuttal
In response to SEBI's allegations, BSE submitted a comprehensive reply on February 7, 2025, followed by oral arguments and additional submissions. The exchange’s defense primarily centered on several key points:
- Remedial vs. Punitive Action: BSE argued that the purpose of such inspections is largely remedial, aiming to correct deficiencies rather than impose penalties, especially for minor or first-time defaults.
- Vague Allegations: The exchange contended that the SCN’s allegations were ambiguous and based on "possibility" rather than concrete evidence, thus lacking the legal foundation for penal action.
- Inapplicability of Laws: BSE challenged the invocation of Sections 23GA and 23H of the Securities Contracts (Regulation) Act (SCRA) and Section 15HB of the SEBI Act, asserting that the alleged activities did not fall under BSE's commercial "business" and therefore, these sections were inapplicable or could not be applied concurrently.
- Equal Access to Information: Regarding Regulation 39(3) of the SECC Regulations, BSE maintained that it provided equal access to all market participants, negating any claims of bias.
- No Charging for Data: BSE clarified that a SEBI circular dated February 25, 2022, was irrelevant as the exchange did not charge for data sharing, addressing a potential misinterpretation.
- UPSI Definition: The exchange argued that information available on a stock exchange website cannot be classified as UPSI, and therefore, Regulation 3 of the PIT Regulations did not apply.
- No Systemic Failure or Market Impact: BSE emphasized that any observed irregularities were isolated, did not represent systemic failures, caused no financial loss to investors, and had no wider market impact.
- Cooperation and Corrective Measures: The exchange highlighted its full cooperation with SEBI and stated that it had already implemented corrective measures to address the identified issues.
- SEBI's Counter-Arguments and Ongoing Scrutiny
SEBI clarified that the SCN's allegations were based on clear observations and specific instances, particularly concerning information dissemination, dismissing claims of vagueness.
The order delves into the applicability of relevant sections of SCRA and Regulation 39(3) of the SECC Regulations, reiterating that the latter mandates equal access to information for all market participants.
However, SEBI acknowledged that the charge related to the February 25, 2022, circular was not valid as there was no allegation of BSE charging for data access. The document also begins to dissect the allegations under Regulation 3 of the PIT Regulations.
This ongoing investigation by SEBI underscores the regulator's commitment to maintaining fairness, transparency, and integrity within India's financial markets. The outcome of these proceedings will be closely watched by market participants and stakeholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
Q1: What are the main allegations against BSE by SEBI?
A1: The main allegations include allowing preferential access to unpublished price sensitive information, failing to act against frequent client code modifiers, insufficient review of 'error accounts', and improper handling of client code modifications between institutional clients.
Q2: What SEBI regulations are involved in this case?
A2: The case involves alleged non-compliance with Regulation 39(3) of the SECC Regulations, SEBI (Prohibition of Insider Trading) Regulations, 2015 (PIT Regulations), and various SEBI circulars related to data dissemination and broker conduct.
Q3: What is BSE's primary defense?
A3: BSE's defense includes arguments that the inspection should be remedial rather than punitive, allegations are vague, relevant sections of law are inapplicable, and that any irregularities were not systemic and had no market impact. BSE also stated it has been cooperative and taken corrective actions.
Q4: How does SEBI fine of 24 Lakhs impact Indian investors?
A4: While the direct impact on individual investors is not yet clear, SEBI's action aims to strengthen market integrity and ensure fair play, which ultimately benefits all market participants by fostering a more transparent and trustworthy trading environment.
Stay tuned to BytesToday.in for more updates like this!
